Operations managers frequently pursue waste elimination in the name of lean management. But a common mistake occurs when managers chase cost-cutting, whereas customers value non-cost operations capabilities – such as flexibility, speed, or quality. This can result in knee-jerk, short-term measures that run at counter purposes to long-term strategic interests. Managers can also get sidetracked from more salient opportunities when cost-cutting blinders steer them to low-hanging, but trivial fruit. In this paper we trace out examples of companies pursuing misplaced priorities, highlight the lessons learned, and present counter examples of waste elimination appropriately applied under a lean management framework.
About Rutgers Business Review
About Us
Narendar Sumukadas
University of Hartford, USA
Narendar Sumukadas is an Associate Professor of Operations Management at the Barney School of Business, University of Hartford, USA. He teaches undergraduate and MBA classes in operations management. He has published scholarly and managerial journal articles as well...
David Stec
University of Hartford, USA
David’s professional career includes 30 years of experience in operations and supply chain management complemented with 20 years of graduate and undergraduate teaching experience at private and public business and engineering schools. He is the co-founder and principal...
Related articles
Case
Management
A Case of Corporate Downfall: Thomas Cook's Leadership Crisis and Insolvency
by Rayees Farooq, Debasis Dash
The 178-year-old British travel giant, Thomas Cook Group PLC, ceased operations on September 23, 2019, due to compulsory liquidation. This case study delves...
Human Resources
Management
Balancing Acts in Hybrid Work: Insights from Employees with Disabilities and Managers on Flexibility and Fairness
by Terri R. Kurtzberg, Mason Ameri
Hybrid work has advantages for everyone, but especially for employees with disabilities. In a survey of 100 managers and 100 employees with disabilities, we...