Skip to main content

A recent study found that the odds of firm failure increase significantly after a firm attempts to transition between exploiting current innovations and exploring for new forms of innovation. This is because the skills required to perform one type of innovation differ from those required to perform the other. I look at two firms that failed to make the perilous leap between R&D-based exploration and exploitation, and consider what might have saved them. Firms that make the leap successfully to R&D-based exploration have a history of R&D-based learning, and firms that make the leap to exploitation are not manipulating earnings.

download full article (pdf)
Tim Swift

Tim Swift

Haub School of Business

Tim Swift is an Associate Professor of Strategic Management in the Haub School of Business at St. Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. He brings together 14 years of senior management experience with a doctoral degree in Strategic Management. Prior to coming to academia...

Learn More >

Related articles

Innovation

Human Resources

How to Learn From Failure. Organizational Creativity, Learning, Innovation and the Benefit of Failure

by Riccardo Leoncini

There are many aspects of failure that could be of value to the organization performance. Failures are results that do not confirm previous expectations and...

read more
Creative team discussing ideas

International Business

Innovation

Taking Advantage of R&D Offshoring beyond Innovation

by Alicia Rodríguez, María Jesús Nieto

Globalization, technological advances and the demands of international competition have driven firms to develop activities in their value chains abroad...

read more
Experimenting
Book icon

Print Edition

Learn More
Rutgers University

About Rutgers Business Review

About Us